Alexander the Great
Alexander the Great was great in many ways. He did extraordinary things in his life that make him worthy to be called great. He was strong, courageous and a smart military leader. He took cultures from countries that he conquered and made them into the "Hellenistic Culture" out of the existing cultures to pick from. He does deserve to be called great, because of his accomplishments, and his military dominance. Historically, people say that he indeed was great. They say he was an example of military dominance to later empires, and he was respected for his accomplishments hundreds of years after his death. Alexander deserves to be called great because of his accomplishments, his military power, and the spread of culture, and historically, most people agree that he was a great man.
![]() |
Statue of Alexander the Great By Gunnar Bach Pedersen |
![]() |
Alexander the Great riding into the battle of Guagamela |
Historically, the public opinion is that Alexander was great. Some people say that Alexander didn't really combine many different cultures into the blended, Hellenistic Culture. Some people say that Alexander the Great does not deserve to be called Great because he didn't live long enough to lose any battles or wars. Some people think that Alexander would have lost a battle if he had lived longer, but he died when he was only 33 years old. Some people also say that Alexander was irresponsible, out of control, and drunk most of the time. Other people feel strongly that Alexander the Great was indeed great. He was a great leader and role model to his people. "There is nothing impossible to him who will try"(Alexander the Great). The public opinion does agree with mine.
Alexander the Great was great in many ways. He was a great leader, and amazing military leader. He was also smart, brave, and put his army first. When his soldiers was worn out, he listened to them and stopped the march, and turned around to go home to Macedonia. He did way more good things then bad things, and he deserves to be called, great.
Works Cited
Hutchinson, Jennifer. "Alexander the Great." World History: Ancient and Medieval Eras,
ABC-CLIO, 2016,ancienthistory.abc-clio.com/Topics/Display/1185179?cid=41&sid=1185179. Accessed 28 Sept. 2016.
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah. “Alexander the Great.” Encyclopedia of the Ancient World: Prehistory to 600 CE, Facts
On File, 2016, Ancient and Medieval History Online, http://online.infobase.com/hrc/search/details/237646?q=alexander the great .
"The real Alexander: the true story behind history's first great conqueror." Current Events, a Weekly Reader publication
29 Oct. 2004: SS1+. General OneFile. Web. 28 Sept. 2016. http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=GPS&sw=w&u=avl_randsch&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA123853432&asid=d4a1b8233626aea4ae4ab1a00a3ea5d .
Reynolds, Clark G. "Alexander the Great." Great Lives from History: The Ancient World, Prehistory-476 c.e.. Ed.
Christina A. Salowey. Hackensack: Salem, 2004. n. pag. Salem Online. Web. 28 Sep. 2016. <http://online.salempress.com>.
1. I really like how he went into a lot of detail on The Phalanx and cavalry that Alexander used. This was really interesting, and fit in really well with his blog.
ReplyDelete2. I did not focus on the main topics that Max did, although I did have some of the same research as him. He went more in depth in the point he was trying to make, and I went more in depth in the points I was trying to make. I did research on Alexander and Bucephalus and The Phalanx and cavalry, but did not go into as much detail as he did because it was not my main focus in my blog.
3. I wish that he would have mentioned why Plutarch or another historic leader thought that Alexander was great. He mentioned a lot about what “some” people think of him, but did not go into as much detail.
1. I thought it was very interesting how you pointed out the many different ways people have historically viewed Alexander.
ReplyDelete2. My research was generally similar to this blog post, but this research was much more focused on why Alexander was great, instead of why he was not.
3. I wish you had mentioned the reasons why people do not believe Alexander is good to give more perspective on other arguments.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1. I found it interesting how Max told and explained the story of Bucephalus.
ReplyDelete2. I discovered the same thing in my research as Max, except I focused more on his humanity.
3. I wish had talked more about Alexander’s childhood and what led up to him becoming king.
1. I think it was interesting that you focused on his combat and military. It was nice to see a more in depth focus on that one thing.
ReplyDelete2. My research showed me mostly the same thing, although your military research seemed to be much more extensive than mine.
3. It would have been interesting if you had included more about his life before he became king. Very well written blog!